Convention on Biological Diversity - Wikipedia
The eleventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP 11) to the . Decisions on biofuels and biodiversity, the Global Strategy for Plant. As world leaders prepare for the Rio+20 meeting in just over a week, led to the creation of the UN conventions on biological diversity, climate. Soccer · NFL · Tennis · MLB · MLS · NBA · NHL . Accept the principle of biodiversity offsetting and you accept the idea Guardian are under threat both here in the US and around the world. 6 Aug urban boundary in order to meet the housing requirements in Policy H1 of the Kent Structure Plan.
Second, there was a lack of credible and independent international scrutiny to monitor delivery.The Symphony of Life - UN Biodiversity Conference - COP14 Egypt 2018
And finally, the international community failed to convert the original Rio agenda into a language that would hold sway in the most powerful departments in each government: It has three objectives. First, it will provide a platform to advance laws and share good legislative practice to underpin the Rio commitments.
The third objective is about incorporating the valuation of natural capital into government accounting. Perversely, we still focus on GDP as the indicator of national wealth, when clearly it is only a partial measure of income that does not take into account the stock of natural capital on which we all depend and our economies rely.
A country can expand its GDP, creating the illusion of increased wealth, while becoming "poorer" as it destroys the natural capital on which its long-term prosperity depends.
Recognising the role of many national parliaments in approving budgets and national accounts, the World Summit of Legislators will examine how the value of natural capital can be integrated into our national economic frameworks. If it doesn't, by the time we find out it will be too late: If the experiment fails it cannot be reversed.
2012 Hyderabad Biodiversity Conference
The report suggests two principal means by which new nightingale habitat could be created in Kent. One is to coppice existing woodland: The other is to take an area of agricultural land and either plant it with scrub or allow scrub to regenerate naturally.
This invites two obvious responses. If woods are chosen, the offsetting process would not be creating wildlife habitat, but merely changing an existing habitat into something different. Coppicing favours some species at the expense of others, particularly those which require large trees, dead wood and an undisturbed understorey.
International Day for Biological Diversity - 22 May
What's good for nightingales may be bad for woodpeckers. If hectares of fields — a bigger site than Lodge Hill — can be taken out of agricultural use to compensate for the destruction of the nightingales' homes, why not spare Lodge Hill and build the houses in the fields?
The prospect of offsetting in this case looks to me like the "licence to destroy" that the government warned against. Rather than compensating for "genuinely unavoidable damage" it looks as if it could be used to justify avoidable destruction: This case illustrates the danger inherent in the principle of offsetting.
Hyderabad: UN meet to discuss biodiversity strategy begins
It's a dismal record. What is the point? The question is, are all these agreements no more than vain promises by cynical governments who only want to wave a piece of paper in front of gullible electorates? Or is there something else going wrong in the system of environmental governance? There are many possibilities: Many agreements on the environment fail to work because governments are also signing up to others on trade or the economy that consistently "trump" environment.
- Biodiversity offsetting will unleash a new spirit of destruction on the land
- Convention on Biological Diversity
- We must put a price on nature if we are going to save it
For instance, even as the Rio Earth summit was taking place in — when no less than four important agreements were signed — negotiations on the Uruguay Round of the general agreement on tariffs and trade Gatt were proceeding, which led to the World Trade Organization WTOwhich then made environmental reform in individual countries far more difficult. Rich countries have consistently promoted a global economic agenda which deliberately opens up poor countries to very powerful corporations who are able to lobby, bully, cajole, or just ignore national and international environmental laws and agreements.
Examples include the oil companies in Nigeria who are able to continue to pollute with impunity, GM companies who have been able to arm-twist developing countries, biofuel companies who pull down forests to grow what they want.
Many countries sign agreements at international conferences like Rio with a great fanfare, but then quietly fail to ratify them or pass them into domestic law.